Why I don’t have roommates
You think you know
What everyone needs
You always take time
To criticize me

(Ironically, that's what my nostrils look like when I blog.)
You think you know
What everyone needs
You always take time
To criticize me

(Ironically, that's what my nostrils look like when I blog.)
This entry was posted on Friday, July 21st, 2006 at 10:08 am and is filed under It's all about me. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
July 21st, 2006 at 10:29 am
Heehee. Posted this a while back, and I still laugh every time I read it.
July 21st, 2006 at 12:43 pm
It doesn’t bother me at all that 99 percent of the posts on my site are my own. I view it as a personal journal. Every once in a while somebody actually gives a rip what I’m thinking. Still haven’t figured out why.
July 22nd, 2006 at 12:23 am
There was a bit of a flareup over my undeniably and obviously superb website format, but thanks to a few deft comment modifications, Joe saw the error of his ways and repented his spurious slander of single-column themes. I didn’t really mean that bit about wanting honest negative feedback =/
Other than that, the celebrity traffic from Amber Night was welcome!
July 25th, 2006 at 2:24 pm
Wizzel Cogcarrier Wizzleton IV :
“Boo hoo, please come and validate my pathetic existance with comments. But don’t point out any of the obvious reasons why my site might be devoid of life, or I will cry.”
You need to get a grip dude, you call “your site causes profuse eye-bleeding in people with moderate to high resolutions” a flare up? One worthy of editing my posts and commenting about here? Geez, my first post here told Amber how her blog sucks. But I guess there must be something wrong with her since she tried to fix it instead of crying.
July 26th, 2006 at 4:02 pm
I get PLENTY of hits on my site, thank-you-very-much. Notice that the entry in question is marked June 16. Right now I’m getting 600 non-bot hits a day on average, spiking at 900-1000 on good days. The day you make a website that gets that kind of readership is the day you can criticize mine without me editing out the “spurious slander.” =p
July 26th, 2006 at 7:32 pm
Hahaha, you crack me up man. 600 hits? You are joking? That day was 8 years ago, back in the wonderous days of UO. If you don’t want people to tell you why alot of people might avoid your site, then try not begging for comments “positive or negative”. When you have a site where people can submit comments, and then you beg them to, some people might be nice enough to do so. Watch what you wish for.
July 26th, 2006 at 11:55 pm
/sigh
Nearly all of my comments thus far have been in jest. I really have no idea what defines a decent number of hits per day, but I am satisfied with 12 x the number I was getting back in June and do not plan to modify the entry in question. Negative feedback is welcomed as long as its constructive; your second one was intolerably rude for the lighthearted tone of the debate. So I edited out the offending dialogue. Lighten up.
And you spelled “wondrous” wrong.
July 27th, 2006 at 10:46 am
My second one was not rude at all, which is why I think you have a problem. I simply told you that my resolution is not exceedingly high, and that I only commented because you asked for comments. Everyone could see that for themselves if you weren’t so childish as to delete it.
And for someone who is telling me “the day I make a site with 600 hits is the day I can critisize” as if posting to a site with almost no traffic is an accomplishment, you really shouldn’t be tossing around epeen remarks. I only measure my epeen in asteroids high scores anyhow.